Mesle A
Over the past 25 years, the economy
grew at an annual average rate of 8.0 %, with a sustained double digit growth
for the past 12 consecutive years (an annual average rate of 10.8%). To sustain
the promising progress and ensure its renaissance, the government has also been
designing various incentive packages to attract more productive domestic and
foreign investors into the manufacturing sector such as tax incentives in some
predetermined development priorities – structural economic transformation being
at the heart of its development endeavor. It is furthermore aspiring to become
a leading industrial hub in Africa in the years to come, especially in that of
light manufacturing industry.
The EPRDF laid down the basic
foundational economy that could enable Ethiopia to make a transition from a
predominantly agricultural economy to an industrial manufacturing sector. In
the last two decades the Government has built numerous roads and bridges that
connected all Ethiopian regions; clinics, schools, and electricity that have
now reinforced rural development; colleges and universities that have now
quadrupled in number compared to the Derg period; there are now 33 universities
throughout Ethiopia and evenly distributed in all the regional states and this
a remarkable stride in educational development although quality education
remains a major challenge. On top of the above mentioned development-related
initiatives, major projects that could also boost the Ethiopian economy are the
Djibouti-Addis Ababa railway; the Addis Ababa City light rail, and other
railroads that are under construction; one major dam, Gilgel Gibe III that is
complete and the Millennium or Renaissance Dam that is in full swing and almost
near completion. Moreover, industrial parks like that of Hawassa and Kombelcha
are also significant in terms of employment and mass production capacity that
will enable Ethiopia to play a major role in export and trade at least at regional
and continental levels.
Recently, however, the public has
come to call out loudly about corruption and rent-seeking, or more generally,
lack of “good governance”. But, as I can see, also drawn from several
literatures, lack of “good governance” is largely an outcome of inappropriate
institutional pillars, in which they would usually require a continual updating
or re-installing. More importantly, unless it is about the issue of whether the
public, the ruling party, and/or the government of an economy are awakens too
early, too late, and somewhere in between, such event is not too strange -- it
usually happens in both emerging and developed economies right after an economy
has achieved some good economic progress2. Hence such event does not
necessarily indicate an erosion of longer term potential, but it does call for
urgent corrective action. In light of this, though arguably it is lately
initiated, and its management is to be seen in the years ahead, such as the
upcoming institutional pillars or systems that the government would put in
place, both the public, the party, and the government are in a promising stage
– they have at least started to pin point the potential causes for the observed
lack of good governance through nationwide public forums.
Historically, Ethiopia has a reputation
for low tolerance for corruption. However, recent assessments, including
Transparency International‘s Corruption Perception Index and the Ibrahim Index,
point to graft as a growing challenge. In 2009, the Ibrahim index ranked
Ethiopia 30 out of 51 African countries, compared to 24 in 2008. Fighting
corruption is a central plank in GoE‘s good governance agenda. To this end, the
Federal Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission has embarked on vigorous
sensitization campaigns. The Commission is conducting value for money audits
and integrity reviews in key sectors (including construction) and plans to
publish annual corruption surveys.
Furthermore, GoE introduced money
laundering and anti-terrorism legislation in 2009 and established a Financial
Intelligence Unit in NBE. In addition, Ethiopia is in the process of joining
the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.
The implementation of Public
Financial Management (PFM) reform at both national and regional level in the
past decade has led to improvements in Ethiopia‘s PFM system. For instance, the
2010 Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) indicated
improvements in 13 out of 14 indicators. Only the indicator for variance
between the budget and actual outturn showed a lower score than in 2007. The
2010 PEFA noted that Ethiopia‘s PFM system is strong with respect to revenue
outturns, arrears monitoring, budget classification, transparency of
inter-governmental relations, policy based budgeting and payroll controls.
While Ethiopia‘s PFM system is
generally sound, there is need for further improvement in certain areas to
ensure effectiveness in the fiduciary safeguards. For instance, the Office of
the Federal Auditor General audits only about 50% of total expenditures.
Moreover, the follow-up on audit queries is generally weak. Other challenges
include internal audit effectiveness, external audits, legislative scrutiny of
the budget law, and donor practices. More broadly, there is need to strengthen
institutions and staffing, particularly at decentralized levels of government.
Corruption is a negative aspect of
devolved federalism in Ethiopia, particularly given the nascent stage of its
regional and sub-regional bureaucracy. As in the past, the EPRDF regime
promotes the use of gim-gima (self-criticism) sessions for bureaucrats as a way
of addressing charges of corruption. However, in recent years this method has
proven to be grossly inadequate to address the problem of official
corruption.
An additional anti-corruption
measure was the introduction in spring of 200 l, the Federal Ethics and Anti-corruption Commission
(FEACC). As 2001 drew to a close, several high profile politicians and businessmen were being
investigated and tried for corruption. In a general sense, what is clear is
that the lack of an ethic of good governance at various levels of Ethiopia’s
government bureaucracies will continue to undercut any efforts to tackle
serious problems of poverty, inequality and discrimination Such an ethic
will no doubt have to be institutionalized,
and forged through practice.
This problem is particularly acute
in the poorest regions. The record shows that while popular participation at
the regional level might have improved, allowing citizens to have more to say about how public funds are spent
and what services are given priority, there has not been a consequent
improvement in the efficiency of administration. The shortage of administrative
capacity, particularly in the poorest regions.” There is a significant regional difference in the availability
of skilled administrative and technical staff, and this is a major constraint
on their autonomous development This is a natural consequence of attempting to
implement a federalist system under conditions of abject poverty and
underdevelopment.
In general, the kind of government
and society ruled solely by self-interested individuals will be a ‘rent-collecting
state or predatory government or in other words a government by thieves.
Government theft’, for example, does manifest itself not only in abusing public
authority for the fulfillment of ‘individual self-interest’ but also in
undermining the spirits of non-self-interested individuals, coalitions and
officials in the name of law, free media, democracy and so on--cynicism. While non-self-interestedness,
the rule of self by the individual from within—intrinsic control,
self-interestedness is a rule by extrinsic appetites like material temptations.
.
The remaining task, therefore, for
the new generation of government officials across the entire public sector, the
ranks of the ruling party, and even opposition parties is to check where they
stand on this and take much needed corrections.
No comments:
Post a Comment